Archive for March, 2008

Recap

The Warriors hopes for getting off to a fast start this season were dealt a devastating blow, with a 75-42 opening game loss to Toyota of Clifton Park.

Turnovers proved extremely costly and led to a lopsided differential in fast break points. Sloppy ball handling, telegraphed passes and the inability to get back on defense quickly made the margin to large to handle.

Early on the Warriors looked good, grabbing the lead in the games opening minutes. Jason Norton drained a couple of treys in the early going to help kick start the Warrior offense. However, with the score tied at 13-13, Toyota erupted for a 19-0 spurt, leading the Warriors 32-16 at halftime. The Warriors never threatened from that point on.

WARRIORS 16 26 - 42
Toyota (CP) 32 43 - 75

Player Quotes

Paul Todd
On why the Warriors lost

“We were out husseled[sic] at both ends of the floor. We turned the ball over 90 times and gave up a lot of fast break points. They also had 4 to 5 extra chances on every shot because we failed to rebound the ball. Defense, protecting the basketball and getting open looks. On offense we need to move the ball better…. Toyota was very good at moving the ball and finding the open man… they must have averaged 4 to 5 passes minimum before taking a shot. We were around 1 to 2 passes.

I know this was the first time many of us have played together.. so I know it will get better. I see a lot of talent on this team.”

Jay Norton
On why the Warriors lost

“Hustle is what killed us more than anything. Im guilty of that myself as by 10 minutes in i felt like i had nothing left in the tank.”

“We werent sticking with our guys in man. I think we have to try at the beginning of the game to match up better with our strengths.”

“We need to switch and call out the picks that are set on us. Screens under the basket need to be used more and i did notice that a bunch of us werent[sic] seeing the open guys under the basket on a few occasions. We stood around alot[sic] on offense watching the guy dribbling the ball instead of moving around to get open. We cant run to the guy with the ball alot[sic] of times there would be three gold jerseys bunched up on one side of the floor whereas they were great at spreading it out. We can do much better im[sic] sure of that.”

Dan Todd
On the Warriors defense

“There seemed to be a lot of confusion about who was guarding who. That lead to a lot of open looks on the perimeter and way too many right underneath the basket for easy layups. Can I suggest a zone defense to fix that problem? 2 guys underneath and 3 guys around the perimeter (or some variation of that). If not, then we need to better communicate who we’re guarding when a sub comes in. My general rule on defense is that if there’s more than an arms-length between me and the guy I’m guarding, there’s too much space for him to work.”

Justin Lajeunesse
On the thought of utilizing a zone defense

“(Zone) couldn’t be nearly as bad as last night giving up points. The thing now is that since we were all nearly drained of energy for the majority of the game a zone would be easier for us to spread and cover until we find ourselves in better shape. Man cover is not the way to go until we can run the floor the entire game. I think that would take the focus off of the ball more and allow us to cover the board more effectively at least giving us a chance to get our composure as a team that has not really played together.”

Mike Pacella
On the large margin of defeat

“If we communicated better, weren’t quite as rusty…that’s at least a 15-20 point turnaround right there”

On the 19-0 run

“It felt like the entire team hung its’ collective head and felt sorry for itself when we fell behind by 10 points. We get in a spot like that again, we need to call timeout regroup and get our heads out of our asses. Not using either of our 2 first half timeouts while watching the other team score 20 straight, won’t happen again.”

East

Sweet 16 Sleepers (seeded 8 or higher)
none. I really don’t think any of the teams seeded 10 or higher have much of a chance making the Sweet 16 in this region.
Final 4 Sleepers (seeded 4 or higher)
none. The top of this region is just too tough.
Regional Final Prediction
North Carolina 83, Tennessee 75 - UNC takes advantage of playing in it’s home state, and moves on to the Final 4. Easy region, in my opinion.

Midwest

Sweet 16 Sleepers
  • 10 Davidson - gritty team, played a very tough early season schedule, could prove awfully tough for the Hoyas.
  • 11 Kansas State - Michael Beasley, games being played in nearby Omaha. Extremely reasonable to see them in the Sweet 16.
  • 12 Villanova - Power conference team can be awfully good when knocking down 3’s. Bad calls proved costly during the season, otherwise this team is seeded higher.
  • 13 Siena - In my opinion, this is the most legitimate chance for an upset by a 13+ seeded team. They pass well, shoot well, and take care of the basketball. Weakness is their size, but they won’t face “big” teams until the Sweet 16
  • Final Four Sleepers
  • 5 Clemson - On the one hand, they could lose in the first round to Villanova. On the other hand, when that press is working, they can beat anybody in the nation. This team is the essence of risk/reward in picking your brackets.
  • Regional Final Prediction
    Wisconsin 67, Kansas 64 - By far this is the most difficult region to pick. You can make a case for so many of these teams making the Final 4. You can make a case for so many of the 10-13 seeds advancing deep into the tournament. My gut says Wisconsin, a strong defensive team that dominated the Big Ten this year, and, perhaps, feels a big slighted by the committee for only receiving a 3 seed. Kansas often seems to underachieve as a 1 seed in the tournament. The Badgers are the pick.

    South

    Sweet 16 Sleepers
  • 12 Temple - Won this years toughest “mid major” conference, playing extremely well at the end of the season. A tough road though as both Michigan State and Pittsburgh are tough opponents.
  • Final Four Sleepers
  • 4 Pittsburgh - This team has the talent and defensive tenacity to beat Memphis and take it all the way to the Final 4.
  • Regional Final Prediction
    Memphis 83, Texas 77 - Ultimately I believe this region will be all chalk. Memphis could, however, be done in either by free throws, or the fact that the regional final will be in Texas.

    West

    Sweet 16 Sleepers
  • 12 Western Kentucky - I love their first round matchup with Drake, and they could certainly provide a lot of trouble for UConn in round 2. Watch out for the Hilltoppers.
  • Final Four Sleepers
  • 7 West Virginia - Bob Huggins has gotten this team to play some great defense this year. I like them to upset Duke, and at least get to the regional final…
  • Regional Final Prediction
    UCLA 55, West Virginia 50 - In the end though, UCLA is the best team in this region. Collison and Love make an amazing inside out combo.

    Final Four

    Semifinal Predictions
    North Carolina 65, Wisconsin 63 - In an extremely tough game, Hansbrough wills the Heels to victory.
    UCLA 76, Memphis 70 - Free throws, free throws, free throws. UCLA knows this, and will exploit it.
    Championship Game
    UCLA 75, North Carolina 72 - In a classic game, the Bruins knock off the Tar Heels.